🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," stated a leading MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust data".

Previously, interest grew behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global debate unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.